[New post] Should peer reviewers comment on writing style?

ScientistSeesSquirrel posted: "There seems to be a pretty widespread agreement that peer review should (even if it can't always) identify flawed reasoning, improper statistical tests, and other serious issues with the inferences a manuscript makes. But should reviewers also make sugges" Respond to this post by replying above this line New post on Scientist Sees Squirrel Should peer reviewers comment on writing style? by ScientistSeesSquirrel There seems to be a pretty widespread agreement that peer review should (even if it can't always) identify flawed reasoning, improper statistical tests, and other serious issues with the inferences a manuscript makes. But should reviewers also make suggestions about writing style? About use of the active voice vs. the passive; about the use of […] Read more of this post This free site is ad-supported. Learn more ​ ScientistSeesSquirrel | November 23, 2021 at 9:00 am | Tags: active voice, humour, passive voice, style, voice | Categories: peer review, scientific writing | URL: https://wp.me/p5x2kS-1qz Comment    See all comments    Like Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from Scientist Sees Squirrel. Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: https://scientistseessquirrel.wordpress.com/2021/11/23/should-peer-reviewers-comment-on-writing-style/ Thanks for flying with WordPress.com